1.
What do you
usually do as a teacher? With what kind of rationale?
I try to do my
best in every class and I would like to have always a transformative role. However,
I think that in this moment I have the three roles: technician, reflective and
transformative. Technician when I want my students do not forget the importance
of discipline, respect and responsibility. I have a reflective role when I as
teacher allow my students to use their abilities to improve their learning and
when I use different strategies to engage my students in the learning process.
Finally, I am a transformative teacher when I have to handle with social and
cultural differences: single parents, loneliness, drugs, poverty etc.
2.
What is your
mind engagement like in the professional exercise of teaching?
Since I became
an English teacher, I have tried to be very responsible with all my duties. I
enjoy to be updated in terms of methodology and strategies. This is one of the
reason I started this master program because I could studied a different master
program just for the title but this is not my case. Moreover, I like to
motivate my students in order they can participate in different activities
inside and outside the school.
3.
How would you
characterize your professional, personal and experiential knowledge of
teaching?
When you
decided to be a teacher, you have to bear in mind that to be a teacher in our
country is not seem as a significant profession in terms of social recognition
and payment. In spite of that I decided to be a teacher because of vocation
because I had the idea to “guarantee personal autonomy and personal
significance” (Hansen, 19 95). However
along with the experience my knowledge of teaching has changed. For me a
teacher is a person who constructs future. The key point here is to move from
work to career and then to occupation and finally to characterize teaching as a
profession.
4.
How do you see
the relationship between theory, research and practice?
I agree with
the author when he states differences between theory and practice. Theory in
terms of knowledge and content and practice to use the theory in a context.
However, Alexander 1986, claims that “to concentrate less on what teachers
should know, and more on how they might think”. In my opinion, this statement
summarizes one of the purpose of this course, reflecting teaching, in relation
to the necessity of developing critical thinking in teacher an also be aware of
the role of teachers as reflective practitioners and as transformative
intellectuals.
5.
To what extent
is there a cause – effect relationship between teaching and learning?
According to
the author “teaching is aimed at creating optimal conditions for desired
learning to take place in as short a time as possible”. I think that the
relationship between teaching and knowledge is not really a cause – effect,
because as the author states teaching is not necessary for learning, a person
can learn from experience. The fact is that teaching acts guides and
facilitates the learning process in a formal way.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario